More than a year ago I started the easy to use math::Functions to handle
the always used mathematical SISO functions to be tested and available.
I switched x, y and z stick input to the freesh programmed deadzone and
exponential functions from the library to unify and clarify their use.
I just realized yaw was left over because it lead to a drift problem in
certain new use cases.
Now I'm just adding the yaw stick to the already well working method.
The FlightTaskManual... tasks already had their internal
setpoint member variables. I switched them to use the
architecture with setpoint member variables as it was
implemented the commit before. They simplify a lot.
I realized that instead of using the setpoint setters inline
in real world tasks everyone started to have its own setpoint
member variable and only call the setter in the end for all the
privatly generate setpoints. This makes the setter useless and
therefore I switched to member setpoints in the architecture.
They bring more felxibility which is obviously needed but also
less structure which is the price to pay.