If we receive gimbal_device_attitude_status by mavlink we should not
re-send it as we are already supposed to be forwarding mavlink traffic
from the gimbal to the ground station.
- camera_trigger module always publishes the camera_trigger msg (independent of the camera feedback)
- Use camera_trigger msg and set the feedback flag
- Subscribing modules determine if the message is relevant based on the feedback message
- remove GPS failsafe mode
- for VTOL: transition to hover in Descend (unless NAV_FORCE_VT is not set)
Signed-off-by: Silvan Fuhrer <silvan@auterion.com>
Signed-off-by: RomanBapst <bapstroman@gmail.com>
commander: support orbit mode for fixed wings
Signed-off-by: RomanBapst <bapstroman@gmail.com>
FwPositionControl: publish orbit status
Signed-off-by: RomanBapst <bapstroman@gmail.com>
commander:reject orbit mode while doing a vtol transition
Signed-off-by: RomanBapst <bapstroman@gmail.com>
FixedWingPositionControl: explicitly cast waypoint for Orbit status
FixedwingPositionControl: fill missing orbit_status fields
navigator_main: handle reposition/orbit corner cases
- set orbit rotation direction correctly
- send mavlink message when orbit is rejected
FixedWingPositionControl: correctly report rotation direction in orbit_status
navigator: hack to not break orbit while doing altitude changes
Signed-off-by: RomanBapst <bapstroman@gmail.com>
navigator: set cruise throttle for orbit command
Signed-off-by: RomanBapst <bapstroman@gmail.com>
By adding the sequence number we can avoid double triggering due to
command retransmissions. This is according to the mavlink spec for
MAV_CMD_IMAGE_START_CAPTURE.
Using mixers on the IO side had a remote benefit of being able to
override all control surfaces with a radio remote on a fixed wing.
This ended up not being used that much and since the original design
10 years ago (2011) we have been able to convince ourselves that the
overall system stability is at a level where this marginal benefit,
which is not present on multicopters, is not worth the hazzle.
Co-authored-by: Beat Küng <beat-kueng@gmx.net>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Agar <daniel@agar.ca>
The both results of ?: should be of same type, and some compilers give error
on this:
" implicit conversion from 'float' to 'double' to match other result of conditional"
Signed-off-by: Jukka Laitinen <jukkax@ssrc.tii.ae>
Daniel Agar