Having newline between I think didn't apply the PR stale days setting of
30 properly (it was using 45)
And it seemd that unless I set the days-before-close to -1
intentionally, it would still close the Issue/PRs, as the default value
is 7 already.
Also updated version of the stale action to v8
* Remove old stale bot yaml file
* Remove slack svg file (unused)
* Stale action: Only apply stale label, and no other actions
Respecting the opinion on
https://github.com/PX4/PX4-Autopilot/commit/fa9ac6ecf651232f3105ca124a2d2c54ab8620d0,
it seems reasonable to disable commenting feature, and just keep the
action only applying the `stale` label. This will reduce the noise /
email spams / ping pong fight with the stale bot (Action)
- Remove unnecessary text rendering, which made clicking log links
harder
- Re adjust markdown elements to make it easier to read / intuitive when
creating an issue
* MAVSDK_Test_Runner: Place PX4 instance runner after Gazebo server runner
- This was a nasty bug where starting PX4 instance first, then starting
Gazebo server was causing PX4 instance' EKF to freak out, probably
because it doesn't like getting data a while after it is started
- Detailed breakdown is given here: https://github.com/PX4/PX4-Autopilot/issues/21229#issuecomment-1450761542
- This now guarantees that such edge case won't occur and MAVSDK test
will run as it should
* MAVSDK Test Runner: Retain comment within 79 character limit
- To pass flake8 python style check
* Update test/mavsdk_tests/mavsdk_test_runner.py
Co-authored-by: Julian Oes <julian@oes.ch>
---------
Co-authored-by: Julian Oes <julian@oes.ch>
* Update README: Maintainers, Boards, Roadmap
- First step after the community coordination call from January 30th
* README: Fromat list & remove discontinued boards & add others
- Addressed comments
* README: Add Simulation, remove QGC
- Only leave the PX4 specific categories (QGC is not)
* Add Beniamino as ROS2 maintainer
* README: Add note that README is main source of truth for maintainers
- We need to have a source of truth, we can use Github README for that.
The srcparser.py is specific to each use case (e.g. Airframes, Parameters, px4events, etc as in Tool/* folders).
Therefore it is confusing to have the px_process_airframes.py script handle concept of airframes under the generic name 'params'.
This improves readability and sets the baseground for implementing more specific vehicle type supports, as mentioned in https://github.com/PX4/PX4-user_guide/pull/1858#discussion_r876554728
- Previously it was hard to check which state the gripper was in
(GRAB/GRABBED/ etc), not even whether it was correctly initialized, this
commit adds that functionality
- When the gripper was uninitialized, the error message popped up
everytime the module had 'any' vehicle command received. But we should
be spamming only when we do actually get 'DO_GRIPPER' command received,
this commit adds that feature
- Also converted error messages for CLI when gripper test functinality
fails, so that user would get a feedback (originally, the PX4_DEBUG was
of course not outputting everything)
