mirror of
https://gitee.com/mirrors_PX4/PX4-Autopilot.git
synced 2026-10-03 14:58:53 +08:00
* Add vitepress tree * Update existing workflows so they dont trigger on changes in the docs path * Add nojekyll, package.json, LICENCE etc * Add crowdin docs upload/download scripts * Add docs flaw checker workflows * Used docs prefix for docs workflows * Crowdin obvious fixes * ci: docs move to self hosted runner runs on a beefy server for faster builds Signed-off-by: Ramon Roche <mrpollo@gmail.com> * ci: don't run build action for docs or ci changes Signed-off-by: Ramon Roche <mrpollo@gmail.com> * ci: update runners Signed-off-by: Ramon Roche <mrpollo@gmail.com> * Add docs/en * Add docs assets and scripts * Fix up editlinks to point to PX4 sources * Download just the translations that are supported * Add translation sources for zh, uk, ko * Update latest tranlsation and uorb graphs * update vitepress to latest --------- Signed-off-by: Ramon Roche <mrpollo@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ramon Roche <mrpollo@gmail.com>
71 lines
4.0 KiB
Markdown
71 lines
4.0 KiB
Markdown
# Battery-Chemistry Overview
|
|
|
|
This section provides a comparative overview of several different battery types (in particular LiPo and Li-Ion) and some useful battery glossary terms.
|
|
|
|
## LiPo vs Li-Ion
|
|
|
|
- Li-Ion batteries have a higher energy density than Lipo battery packs but that comes at the expense of lower discharge rates and increased battery cost.
|
|
- LiPo batteries are readily available and can withstand higher discharge rates that are common in multi-rotor aircraft.
|
|
- The choice needs to be made based on the vehicle and the mission being flown.
|
|
If absolute endurance is the aim then there is more of a benefit to flying to a Li-Ion battery but similarly, more caution needs to be taken.
|
|
As such, the decision should be made based on the factors surrounding the flight.
|
|
|
|
### LiPo
|
|
|
|
Advantages:
|
|
|
|
- Very common
|
|
- Wide range of sizes, capacities and voltages
|
|
- Inexpensive
|
|
- High discharge rates relative to capacity (high C ratings)
|
|
- Higher charge rates
|
|
|
|
缺点:
|
|
|
|
- Low (relative) energy density
|
|
- Quality can vary given abundance of suppliers
|
|
|
|
### Li-Ion
|
|
|
|
Advantages:
|
|
|
|
- Much higher energy density (up to 60% higher)
|
|
|
|
缺点:
|
|
|
|
- Not as common
|
|
- Much more expensive
|
|
- Not as widely available in large sizes and configurations
|
|
- All cells are relatively small so larger packs are made up of many cells tied in series and parallel to create the required voltage and capacity
|
|
- Lower discharge rates relative to battery size (C rating)
|
|
- More difficult to adapt to vehicles that require high currents
|
|
- Lower charging rates (relative to capacity)
|
|
- Requires more stringent temperature monitoring during charge and discharge
|
|
- Requires settings changes on the ESC to utilize max capacity ("standard" ESC low voltage settings are too high).
|
|
- At close-to-empty the voltage of the battery is such that a ~3V difference is possible between a Lipo to Li-ion (while using a 6S battery).
|
|
This could have implications on thrust expectations.
|
|
|
|
## C Ratings
|
|
|
|
- A C rating is simply a multiple of the stated capacity of any battery type.
|
|
- A C rating is relevant (and differs) for both charge and discharge rates.
|
|
- For example, a 2000 mAh battery (irrespective of voltage) with a 10C discharge rate can safely and continuously discharge 20 amps of current (2000/1000=2Ah x 10C = 20 amps).
|
|
- C Ratings are always given by the manufacturer (often on the outside of the battery pack).
|
|
While they can actually be calculated, you need several pieces of information, and to measure the internal resistance of the cells.
|
|
- LiPo batteries will always have a higher C rating than a Li-Ion battery.
|
|
This is due to chemistry type but also to the internal resistance per cell (which is due to the chemistry type) leading to higher discharge rates for LiPo batteries.
|
|
- Following manufacturer guidelines for both charge and discharge C ratings is very important for the health of your battery and to operate your vehicle safely (i.e. reduce fires, “puffing” packs and other suboptimal states during charging and discharging).
|
|
|
|
## Energy Density
|
|
|
|
- Energy density is how much energy is able to be stored relative to battery weight.
|
|
It is generally measured and compared in Watt Hour per Kilogram (Wh/Kg).
|
|
- Watt-hours are simply calculated by taking the nominal (i.e. not the fully charged voltage) multiplied by the capacity, e.g. 3.7v X 5 Ah = 18.5Wh.
|
|
If you had a 3 cell battery pack your pack would be 18.5Wh X 3 = 55 Wh of stored energy.
|
|
- When you take battery weight into account you calculate energy density by taking the watt-hours and dividing them by weight.
|
|
- E.g. 55 Wh divided by (battery weight in grams divided by 1000).
|
|
Assuming this battery weighed 300 grams then 55/(300/1000)=185 Wh/Kg.
|
|
- This number 185 Wh/Kg would be on the very high-end for a LiPo battery.
|
|
A Li-Ion battery on the other hand can reach 260 Wh/Kg, meaning per kilogram of battery onboard you can carry 75 more watt-hours.
|
|
- If you know how many watts your vehicle takes to fly (which a battery current module can show you), you can equate this increased storage at no additional weight into increased flight time.
|