Fix all possible HTTP to HTTPS docs links (#25153)

This commit is contained in:
Hamish Willee
2025-07-03 18:09:58 +10:00
committed by GitHub
parent 375f421c61
commit 2c31e2bad5
84 changed files with 276 additions and 359 deletions
+12 -4
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
# mRo-X2.1 Autopilot
# mRo-X2.1 Autopilot (Discontinued)
<Badge type="info" text="Discontinued" /> <!-- 202507 / PX4v1.16 -->
:::warning
This flight controller has been [discontinued](../flight_controller/autopilot_experimental.md) and is no longer commercially available.
:::
:::warning
PX4 does not manufacture this (or any) autopilot.
@@ -16,7 +22,7 @@ This flight controller is [manufacturer supported](../flight_controller/autopilo
## Quick Summary
- Main System-on-Chip: [STM32F427](http://www.st.com/web/en/catalog/mmc/FM141/SC1169/SS1577/LN1789)
- Main System-on-Chip: [STM32F427](https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32f427-437.html)
- CPU: STM32F427VIT6 ARM<sup>&reg;</sup> microcontroller - Revision 3
- IO: STM32F100C8T6 ARM<sup>&reg;</sup> microcontroller
- Sensors:
@@ -29,8 +35,10 @@ This flight controller is [manufacturer supported](../flight_controller/autopilo
- Mounting Points: 30.5mm x 30.5mm 3.2mm diameter
- Weight: 10.9g
The diagram below provides a side-by-side comparison with a Pixhawk 1. The mRo features almost identical hardware and connectivity but
has a much smaller footprint. Major differences are updated sensors and Rev 3 FMU.
The diagram below provides a side-by-side comparison with a Pixhawk 1.
The mRo features almost identical hardware and connectivity but
has a much smaller footprint.
Major differences are updated sensors and Rev 3 FMU.
![Mro Pixhawk 1 vs X2.1 comparison](../../assets/flight_controller/mro/px1_x21.jpg)